Liberalism and its critics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Liberalism and its critics - Essay Example Having discussed that liberalism puts forward the interests of fighters; critics claim that liberalism is also an ideological system of struggle that stands for things like unprincipled peace. As a result, critics maintain that liberalism brings about something called political degeneration in different individuals and units within a party and within revolution organizations. Additionally, Mao puts across that liberalism gives rise to or creates decadent. In terms of manifestation, liberalism manifests itself in a number of ways. For instance, liberalism lets things flow freely or slide in the name of friendship and peace despite the fact that a person has made a mistake (66). This happens mainly because this person might be an old subordinate, a fellow townsman, a loved one, or a close friend. Based on this revelation, Fredonians should pursue liberalism with caution as it might end up dividing the society into halves. Moreover, it is worthwhile for the people of Fredonia to refrain from liberalism as they have very little knowledge about it thus making it unwise to take up the weapon of liberalism against the foreigners and aristocrats. Citations maintain that the so-called â€Å"Patriots† have limited knowledge concerning liberalism. This shows that they do not have insights into this kind of action, which makes them unaware of damages that might befall them in case they happen to opt for liberalism. As depicted by Mao, liberalism involves indulgence into irresponsible criticism that takes place privately as opposed to voicing out suggestions and ideas as well as cause for action to the organization (79). Truthfully, advising Fredonians to refrain from liberalism is a pragmatic way of avoiding further oppression as it shows no regard for principles of collective living but follows individual inclination. Revolution History explains that, since Middle Ages, there has been an existence of so cietal struggles. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels assert that, presence of the oppressor and the oppressed, patrician and the plebian, free people and the slave as well as the master of guild and the journey was and still is the causal factor behind revolutionaries (85). These authors point out clearly that, revolution could act as a weapon against certain inhumane actions but in most cases, its results are unimaginable. Generally, revolution either comes along with re-construction of the involved society in bits or at large or results to rampant ruin of almost every contending class. Fact findings establish that history based on epochs of revolution bring out undesirable end product as all societies involved suffered a manifold of gradation in terms of social ranks (91). For example, in ancient Rome, revolution resulted to slaves, knights, patricians, and plebeians. In order for â€Å"The Patriots† to kick out foreigners and aristocrats, it is advisable for them to revolution ize their nation despite criticism. This is because for them to attain reforms there must